“Summer water in a restored native grassland flushes annual grass seed bank but fails to increase native perennial cover” published!

Our manuscript entitled “Summer water in a restored native grassland flushes annual grass seed bank but fails to increase native perennial cover”, co-authored with Dr. Truman P. Young, has been published in the journal Ecosphere (see link here, or download here with supplemental material here).

In this manuscript we detail our experiment to test summer watering to ‘flush’ the exotic annual grass seedbank in a post-restoration grassland setting. While flushing of weeds is a common pre-restoration practice to reduce weed pressure, this technique has not been tested in a previously restored native perennial grassland. Weed management and re-invasion – particularly of invasive Mediterranean annual grasses – is of particular concern for the long-term success of restored grasslands. However options are somewhat limited to application of herbicides, burning, and grazing, which are not always feasible. Previous research has shown flushing of annual grasses may be accomplished, but this was generally tested in a pre-restoration setting, greenhouse, or in different ecosystems, and has not been investigated longer-term. Our study in a 2-year old restored native perennial grassland revealed that flushing temporarily reduced annual grass cover, but did not confer a reduction in cover into the following growing season. Native perennial cover also did not increase significantly one-year post-treatment.

Preferred citation: Wolf KM, Young TP. 2016. Summer water at restored native grassland sites to flush annual exotic seedbank and increase native perennial cover. Ecosphere 7(6):e01309. DOI#10.1002/ecs2.1309.

Abstract:  Natural and artificial flushing of the weed seed bank, followed by killing of seedlings, is a common practice in agricultural and prerestoration settings, but its application for post-restoration management has not been tested in the context of restored native plants. Summer watering at already restored sites could reduce exotic annual grass cover by decreasing the seed bank, thereby increasing native perennial success in subsequent growing seasons. Five replicated watering treatments of 11.35 L per watering event were applied for up to a 4 week period, with watering events ranging from once daily for a minimum or four and maximum of 16 d, or twice daily for 4 d, for a total of 45.4–181.7 L water applied in each 1-m2 plot. Two of the watering treatments triggered significant flushing of annual grasses: watering for a total of 16 d once per day, and 4 d twice per day. Although this conferred a short-term reduction in annual grass emergence at the start of the subsequent rainy season, it did not reduce total annual cover at peak flowering in the growing season, or provide a longer term advantage to native perennial grasses. It is possible that there are sufficient seeds in the seed bank that this at least partly compensated for the seed bank reduction and did not result in a reduction in final cover, or that lower densities of seedlings are sufficient to achieve “total” cover. Perennial grass cover increased in response to all watering treatments, but this did not result in significantly increased cover the following year. These results suggest that even watering treatments that produce large flushes of exotic annual grasses are insufficient to reduce exotic cover longer term. It should be explored whether more water, applied more frequently, could be effective in reducing the exotic grass seed bank enough to confer a long-term reduction in exotic cover and a benefit to native perennial grasses.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s